Month: April 2020

Wall St., Main St. look for gold prices to strengthen  Kitco NEWS

Hello again, and welcome to another edition of the Weekly Market Wrap Podcast, I’m Mike Gleason.

Well, just when you thought you’d seen it all in markets, this week brought something that was previously assumed by many to be impossible: a negative price for a physical commodity.

More on that in a bit. But first, let’s review this week’s market action in precious metals, which have been posting some positive gains since bottoming last month.

Gold prices are up 0.9% since last Friday’s close to bring spot prices to $1,720 per ounce. Silver shows a weekly decline now of 1.8% to trade at $15.13 an ounce as of this Friday recording. Platinum is putting off by 2.4% decline for the week to bring the per ounce price to $768. And finally, palladium looks lower this week by 6.4% and currently comes in at $2,074.

The metals complex showed relative stability this week as the oil market suffered a historic meltdown. West Texas Intermediate Crude crashed 70% at one point this week on the continuous contract, bringing prices briefly below $7 per barrel. By Thursday, prices were trading between $14 and $18 per barrel.

The volatility on the May futures contract was even more extreme. On Monday, May futures for crude oil crashed to one dollar, then to zero, then to a few pennies below zero, then to an unbelievable negative $37 per barrel.

With the world literally running out of places to store oil, oil contracts for immediate physical offtake represented a liability rather than an asset. Nobody wanted to take delivery of oil. That left speculators, hedge funds, and exchange-traded funds that hold oil futures as financial instruments only needing to unload their contracts at any price. They ultimately would rather pay buyers to take unwanted barrels of oil than assume the obligation and hassle of owning them.

Some traders cried foul over the apparent forced selling and filed complaints with the CME Group, which runs the world’s largest commodity exchange, and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Billionaire oil executive Harold Hamm of Continental Resources wrote a letter to the CFTC calling for the agency to investigate possible market manipulation.

CME Group Chairman Terry Duffy responded on CNBC by insisting the futures market was functioning just fine and had not mispriced oil contracts when they began trading below zero.

CNBC Anchor: There was one that comment he put in his letter to the CFTC. He asked them to investigate whether there had been market manipulation or failed systems or computer programs that played a part in our going negative. If they carried out that investigation, can you answer what they’d find for us now?

Terry Duffy: You know, the CME, we are a neutral facilitator of risk management, and we’re happy if people want to look into the markets. Futures contracts have been around for hundreds of years and I will tell you since day one, everybody knows that it’s unlimited losses in futures. So, nobody should be under the perception that it can’t go below zero.

Regardless of whether the market was manipulated, the deeply negative futures price was disconnected from physical reality.

Nobody could call up an oil producer and expect to be able to buy barrels of oil for less than nothing because of a negatively trading futures contract. No oil company announced to investors that its oil assets had suddenly become liabilities because of a negative futures quote. In fact, energy stocks traded higher this week.

Although many oil producers are losing money at the moment, it’s not because they are literally selling oil at a negative price. It’s because their production and storage costs are exceeding the real-world prices they can fetch for their product.

And that real-world price is now in the teens per barrel. The absurd negative $37 figure on a particular futures contract was never seen as a credible gauge of the global value of physical oil.

The credibility of the gold and silver futures markets is also being called into question. Earlier this month the spread between COMEX gold futures and the London so-called spot price grew to a record high of more than $80.

Something strange is going on. The COMEX and London markets curiously changed their rules to allow 400-ounce gold bars located in London to be substituted for delivery of 100-ounce gold bars in satisfaction of U.S. contracts, actions which have drawn the attention of Congressman Alex Mooney of West Virginia.

Rep. Mooney is now demanding the CFTC explain why U.S. markets are permitted to carry so little deliverable physical gold and silver to back the exchanges. If there are widespread defaults, it could throw the entire financial system into chaos.

At the same time, an enormous divergence between spot prices and the prices on bullion coins, bars, and rounds have developed.

So, what is the real price of gold? What is the real price of silver?

The answer is that it depends on the form in which it is traded. Paper contract settlements carry one price. Bullion bars carry another. And American Eagles carry yet another.

For example, while the silver spot price closed at $15.36 on Thursday, Silver Eagles were selling for $27 or more at Money Metals’ higher-priced competitors. Certainly a few of these dealers are getting greedy or struggling with insufficient capital, but the elevated premiums in general DO reflect extraordinarily strong retail demand on the one hand – and on the other, higher sourcing costs and U.S. Mint closures that threaten to crimp supply.

Coin values cannot be manipulated arbitrarily on a futures exchange. No physical bullion product will suddenly acquire a negative price because a handful of traders desperately need to unload contracts at a particular time and can’t find buyers.

As long as you aren’t using leverage, your downside risk in bullion is limited. That’s certainly not the case if you choose to play gold and silver futures. There, as you heard the head of the CME/COMEX admit, you could potentially lose more than 100% of the capital you deploy.

The upshot for holders of physical is that in the event the highly leveraged precious metals futures markets lose credibility, and especially if they melt down and default on obligations to deliver, a squeeze on available inventories of physical metal could push bullion prices explosively higher – regardless of what the paper quotes for gold and silver happen to be.

Well that will do it for this week. Be sure to check back next Friday for our next Weekly Market Wrap Podcast. Until then this has been Mike Gleason with Money Metals Exchange, thanks for listening and have a great weekend everybody.

Source: Peter Epstein for Streetwise Reports   04/23/2020

Peter Epstein of Epstein Research discusses the macro picture for precious metals prices and one junior who he believes will benefit from higher prices.

Timing is everything. Precious metals are up when almost everything else is down. Gold has soared 38% from last year’s low. This is a big move, but few investors seem to appreciate its significance. Earlier this week, Bank of America announced a gold price target of US$3,000/oz by the end of 2021. While that might sound too aggressive, today’s price of US$1,740/oz. = ~C$2,463/oz. is already quite strong.

The current price is more than enough for well managed juniors, with attractive projects, in safe and prolific jurisdictions, to thrive. Right now, some of the best precious metal jurisdictions, as measured by low-costs plus ample exploration upside, include parts of Mexico, Canada and Australia.

In an April 13, 2020, Myrmikan Research investment letter, manager Daniel Oliver made strong arguments that gold and silver prices are headed higher, perhaps much, much higher. Mr. Oliver has been published in Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, Real Clear Markets, National Review, among others. He has a J.D. from Columbia Law School and an MBA from INSEAD.

Most important for the purposes of this article, Oliver is a director of tiny silver-gold junior Vangold Resources Ltd. (VGLD:TSX.V; VGLDF:OTCQB). {corporate presentation} In his commentary, he unveils three potential paths or scenarios for precious metals.

In the first scenario,

“…the magnitude of the dollar debt overhang is so large—tens of trillions—that policy makers cannot practically prevent the inverted credit pyramid from tipping over. The result is a panic more intense by magnitudes than 2008 or 1929. Gold does well on a relative basis, but falls in nominal terms.”

In the second scenario,

“….trillions of dollars does little to help local businesses and the working class. Wall Street, however, is not just saved, but levers up bailout largess to create spectacular increases in asset prices. Gold spikes in nominal terms as it did from 2009 to 2011 under similar conditions. Gold mining equities soar….”

Finally, in the third scenario,

“….the Fed’s helicopter drop of dollars precipitates a currency crisis. Gold bullion rockets toward $10,000 per ounce. Gold miners (especially marginal, higher risk players) have breath-taking increases, last experienced from 1978 to 1981.”

Oliver believes the first scenario is by far least likely to unfold, an end-of-the-world type of event that we need not focus on because the world would be over…. The remaining two paths are bullish, and extremely bullish, respectively for physical gold and silver and precious metals juniors.

Make no mistake, just because Dan Oliver and a growing cadre of investment experts are talking up precious metals doesn’t guarantee the price will shoot to the moon or even rise from current levels. However, giant hedge, mutual and generalist funds are looking closely at precious metals and the companies that explore for, develop and mine them.

Relative value funds have plenty of industry sectors to avoid, but only a few that offer potential upside combined with low correlation to, and diversification from, the overall market. Glowing reports of precious metals’ fabulous future are a lot more palatable given that a tsunami of global debt obligations will be issued, with no end in sight.

As bad, or perhaps even worse, is governments’ willingness, in a blink of an eye, to direct their central banks to print absurd amounts of money out of thin air. Combined, debt plus unfunded and under-funded liabilities will explode much higher. Not by tens or hundreds of billions, but by trillions of dollars. It’s no longer just a theory (ongoing unbelievably large and unsustainable debt), the pandemic has made it a certainty.

Vangold Mining has many positive attributes. Its 100%-owned silver-gold project is in a safe and desirable location in central Mexico, the state of Guanajuato. At its peak in the 18th century, the mines of Guanajuato, especially the world famous Valenciana mine, were considered the largest and richest on the planet. In the 50 years from 1760 to 1810, Guanajuato (mostly from Valenciana) often accounted for 20% of global silver production, primarily from a single extraordinarily rich vein. {corporate presentation}

The company’s flagship property hosts the high-grade, past-producing El Pinguico mine that was only shut down due to the Mexican Revolution in 1913 (it wasn’t mined out). The mine operated on ten levels with four major shafts. From the early 1890s until 1913, El Pinguico was one of the highest grade mines in Guanajuato.

The cut-off grade was reportedly 15 g/t (0.48 oz./t) gold equivalent. Mining was done exclusively at the El Pinguico and El Carmen vein systems, which are thought to be splays off of the Mother Vein. El Pinguico is surrounded by well-known players, including Fresnillo PLC, Endeavour Silver, Great Panther and Argonaut Gold.

Modest near-term cash flow is possible from exploiting a surface stockpile this year, but more meaningful profit potential exists from extracting (and getting toll-milled) meaningful underground stockpiles grading ~3.6 g/t Au eq in 2012, the Mexican Geological Society estimated there were ~174,500 tonnes of material stockpiled underground. Assuming an 85% recovery, that equates to about a 20,000-ounce Au eq opportunity.

The plan is to reinvest net cash flow into new exploration and development activities at El Pinguico. It’s critical for readers to understand that Vangold has substantial exploration upside above and beyond monetization of stockpiles. Interestingly, the company stands to benefit from at least three things due to the global pandemic.

First, significantly lower energy costs, second, a favorable move in FX rates (weaker CAD$ and Mexican peso vs. the US$), and third, lower project costs (drilling, mining equipment and services, labor) as people will, presumably, be anxious to get back to work. Globally, unemployment rates are likely to remain elevated for an extended period.

Vangold has a substantial database of valuable exploration data including historical underground channel sampling and drilling. Samples from around the year 1909 include blockbuster grades. The best were; 0.7m @ 23.0 g/t Au + 3,858 g/t Ag, {~61.6 g/t Au Eq.}, another one of 0.8m @ 16.7 g/t Au + 3,054 g/t Ag, {~47.2 g/t Au eq}, and a third, 0.7m @ 15.7 g/t Au + 1,793 g/t Ag, {~33.6 g/t Au eq}.

As mentioned, prior mining at El Pinguico was from two vein systems (El Pinguico and El Carmen) thought to be offshoots of the Veta Madre (“Mother Vein”). The Veta Madre has been, and continues to be, incredibly important to the region. It stretches at least 25 km and has reportedly produced upwards of 1.2 billion ounces of silver.

From Endeavour’s website, “Silver was originally discovered by Spanish explorers in 1548 and subsequently at Guanajuato in 1552. Guanajuato is considered one of the top three historic silver mining districts in Mexico, having produced an estimated 1.0 to 1.2 billion ounces silver, plus 5 to 6 million ounces gold.”

The Veta Madre is also highly prospective for Vangold as it is known to extend to within 250 meters of the company’s border. Management believes it likely crosses through their property at between 400 and 600 meters depth. Importantly, Vangold is not the only company chasing the Mother Vein.

With a much higher gold price, silver not so much (yet), especially in Mexican peso terms, the region has become one of the hotter mining jurisdictions in North America. C$10 billion Fresnillo PLC is reopening a prolific (1970’s to 2002) mine that will bring additional workers, equipment and mining services to the area. The mine reopening is happening next year, just 2 km from Vangold’s project.

In addition to director Daniel Oliver, Vangold has a tremendous team for a company with a market cap of just C$2.7 million. Led by the highly experienced and well-connected James Anderson, who’s been working hard for the past year to revitalize this story, the company’s ship may have just come in. And, I should add, a rising (gold-silver) tide lifts all boats!

Readers should strongly consider taking a few minutes to review Vangold Mining’s (TSX-V: VGLD) / (OTCQB: VGLDF) brand new corporate presentation. Please visit the last two pages which extoll the considerable talents and experience of the management team.

Peter Epstein is the founder of Epstein Research. His background is in company and financial analysis. He holds an MBA degree in financial analysis from New York University’s Stern School of Business.

Disclosures / disclaimers: The content of this article is for information only. Readers fully understand and agree that nothing contained herein, written by Peter Epstein of Epstein Research [ER], (together, [ER]) about Vangold Mining, including but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts, calculations, etc. is to be considered implicit or explicit investment advice. Nothing contained herein is a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security. [ER] is not responsible for investment actions taken by the reader. [ER] has never been, and is not currently, a registered or licensed financial advisor or broker/dealer, investment advisor, stockbroker, trader, money manager, compliance or legal officer, and does not perform market making activities. [ER] is not directly employed by any company, group, organization, party or person. The shares of Vangold Mining are highly speculative, not suitable for all investors. Readers understand and agree that investments in small cap stocks can result in a 100% loss of invested funds. It is assumed and agreed upon by readers that they will consult with their own licensed or registered financial advisors before making any investment decisions.

At the time this article was posted, Peter Epstein owned stock and warrants in Vangold Mining, and the Company was an advertiser on [ER].

While the author believes he’s diligent in screening out companies that, for any reasons whatsoever, are unattractive investment opportunities, he cannot guarantee that his efforts will (or have been) successful. [ER] is not responsible for any perceived, or actual, errors including, but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts & financial calculations, or for the completeness of this article or future content. [ER] is not expected or required to subsequently follow or cover any specific events or news, or write about any particular company or topic. [ER] is not an expert in any company, industry sector or investment topic.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter at: www.streetwisereports.com/get-news

Streetwise Reports Disclosure:
1) Peter Epstein’s disclosures are listed above.
2) The following companies mentioned in the article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.

4) The article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article until three business days after the publication of the interview or article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases.

Graphics provided by the author.

( Companies Mentioned: VGLD:TSX.V; VGLDF:OTCQB,
)

Source: Bob Moriarty for Streetwise Reports   04/23/2020

Bob Moriarty of 321gold discusses recent developments at three junior mining companies that have done deals with majors.

I’ve been pretty quiet about mining shares lately as I try to get a handle on what the real story is on the Corona Virus. That doesn’t mean the companies have been quiet and indeed they have not been. The Corona Virus story looks more and more like a scam on the part of big Pharma with each passing day so I will be doing more writing on it.

Three of our advertisers have done deals lately with majors and are showing the next trend in the junior market. Behind the scenes, the majors and mid-tier mining companies are beginning to realize that they need to be doing deals with the best and brightest of the juniors right now.

The efforts of the US government to bail out a totally insolvent financial system just put gold and silver into what will be the ultimate afterburner. I would be perfectly happy with a correction soon to clean out some of the deadwood that like to buy at tops but down the road, the dollar, the bond market and the stock market are toast.

What else is left to invest in?

The CRB Commodity Index has crashed by 75% from its peak in 2008. It is at the lowest level since 1972. Yes, we are in a depression and prices have plummeted but we still need commodities. Everything is cheap.

The long oil positions crashing this week to minus $37 a barrel show just how dysfunctional our financial system is right now. I don’t know when gold and silver will kick into high gear, it isn’t here yet.

But could we see gold up $200 in a day and silver up $10? Yes and I think we will. The door to investing into resource shares is a little tiny door. When everyone wants to go through at the same time, it’s going to get pretty crowded.

Newcrest backed out of a deal with GFG Resources Inc. (GFG:TSX.V; GFGSF:OTCQB) on the Rattlesnake property in Wyoming recently. Rattlesnake is an alkaline system. Those tend to be both very big and very rich.

I hate them.

They also eat a lot of money. Newcrest put about $5 million into Rattlesnake and drilled a deep hole that hit a lot of rock. Even very big, very well run companies like Newcrest hit dusters on a regular basis. Did I mention that alkaline systems tend to be very big and very rich? And eat a lot of money.

I can’t fault Newcrest. I do still think they are one of the finest mining companies in the world. Their geos had a theory. They poured a lot of money into the ground and hit SFA.

At about the same time GFG announced a monster hit at Plan B, the PEN property in Ontario. They had an 8.5-meter intercept of 71.27 grams gold. The Newcrest announcement was on Friday April 3^rd and the PEN assays were released on Monday April 6^th.

I’ll be really charitable and say that I think the really negative press release and the really positive press release came out at about the same time by coincidence because when I start thinking that companies are massaging their stock price in the face of bad news I get really snarky. If it was a coincidence I would like to see it be a solo coincidence.

When I wrote about GFG a long time back, I said that having a Plan B was a great idea. Because if one project doesn’t pan out, you have a backup. The Eastern Canada operations have turned out to be brilliant and will more than support the value of the company regardless of what happens to Rattlesnake.

Rattlesnake is still a high potential project. There have been a lot of good hits there and the feeders are there somewhere. Gold going up makes the odds of failure go down so Rattlesnake is still a great project for GFG. Someone will want to do a deal. Geos have more theories than Starbucks has flavors of coffee.

But meanwhile on the strength of the PEN monster hit, Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI:TSX; AGI:NYSE) has stepped up to the plate to inject enough money into a non-brokered PP to bring them up to 9.9%. It will be about $5 million in flow-through shares at $0.291 and non-flow through shares at $0.19. Not only is Alamos putting money into the company at a premium, there are zero warrants.

Darn, I want in the PP as well and I love warrants.

I’ve written about TriStar Gold Inc. (TSG:TSX.V) before. They have a conglomerate gold system in Brazil. Quinton Hennigh, Erik Wetterling of the Hedgeless Horseman and I snuck in a visit to Brazil in February just before the Iron Curtain came down all over the world.

It was a really great visit. TriStar has a smoothly functioning team with very nice and highly qualified geos. And some are quite attractive.

Erik gives Fernanda panning lessons at TriStar

Quinton gave a 30-minute brief talking about how they have three different styles of gold in three different horizons. I though I understood conglomerate gold systems before but he made it very simple.

He and I made a ten-day scouting trip to New Zealand in 2009 before going to Perth to meet with Mark Creasy on the deal that became Novo Resources. In any case, we actually visited a beach on the west coast of the South Island of New Zealand. Under certain wind and tide conditions, the beach would become covered with a thin layer of gold brought in from the sea floor just off shore. I had seen gold in sand but didn’t understand it in context until Quinton spoke in Brazil.

Quinton’s lecture

Different layers of conglomerate

Conglomerate

TriStar Gold is yet another junior that has a major betting on their success. In August of last year TriStar announced an $8 million deal with Royal Gold where Royal put in money in different tranches and got some warrants as well. Royal was buying a 1.5% NSR on production. Nobody bets $8 million on production unless they have a high degree of confidence that the company will actually get into production.

Not to be outdone, Precipitate Gold just announced a funding deal with Barrick Gold. Barrick is willing to pay up to $10 million in exploration on Precipitate’s Pueblo Grande project and conduct a pre-feasibility study to earn 70% of the property. In addition Barrick will invest $1.39 million CAD into Precipitate shares at $0.11.

I went to see the Pueblo Grande project about ten years ago. It is belly to belly with Barrick’s Pueblo Viejo Gold Mine. That was in construction when I was there and now in production at a rate of nearly 600,000 ounces for Barrick with right at 1 million ounces a year total. Pueblo Viejo is owned 60% by Barrick and 40% by Newmont. As a tax source, the mine is the most important industry in the Dominican Republic. It is also the largest gold mine in the Americas.

I like to keep investing simple. Barrick knows what they are producing per year. They know the grade and the cost. They also fully understand the geology. By buying the right to own 70% of Pueblo Grande from Precipitate, they know exactly what they are getting and what the cost is and what the value is.

I love reading the chat boards because the vast majority of posters all believe they know better than the companies as to what they should do. Most posters know in their hearts that they could do a much better job of running the company. That’s daft of course and I rarely come across deep or really thoughtful discussion. But if the biggest mining company in the country wants to put money into your project, the project is probably worth having. It’s not a bit more complicated than that.

If Barrick funds $10 million in exploration they will find gold. They have the mill right next door so the only cost of production for Precipitate is paying 30% of hauling the gold to the mill. I’m not quite sure how the math works; Barrick would own 70% of Pueblo Grande but only 60% of the mill at Pueblo Viejo. Newmont is a part owner and they will have to be compensated for use of the mill.

Precipitate still has other projects and now will be fully funded to do exploration on them.

I own shares in all three companies both bought in the open market and participation in private placements. All three companies are advertisers so naturally I am biased. Do your own due diligence.

GFG Resources
GFG-V $.22 (Apr 23, 2020)
GFGSF OTCBB 109 million shares
GFG Resources website

TriStar Gold Corp
TSG-V $0.29 (Apr 23, 2020)
TSGZF-OTCBB 182 million shares
TriStar Gold website

Precipitate Gold Corp
PRG-V $.13 (Apr 23, 2020)
PREIF-OTCBB 118 million shares
Precipitate Gold website

Bob Moriarty
President: 321gold
Archives
321gold

Bob Moriarty founded 321gold.com, with his late wife, Barbara Moriarty, more than 16 years ago. They later added 321energy.com to cover oil, natural gas, gasoline, coal, solar, wind and nuclear energy. Both sites feature articles, editorial opinions, pricing figures and updates on current events affecting both sectors. Previously, Moriarty was a Marine F-4B and O-1 pilot with more than 832 missions in Vietnam. He holds 14 international aviation records.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter at: www.streetwisereports.com/get-news

Disclosure:
1) Bob Moriarty: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: GFG Resources, TriStar Gold and Precipitate Gold. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this article: GFG Resources, TriStar Gold and Precipitate Gold are advertisers on 321 Gold. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
2) The following companies mentioned are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
4) The article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article until three business days after the publication of the interview or article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases. As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of GFG Resources, Royal Gold and Newmont Goldcorp, companies mentioned in this article.

( Companies Mentioned: GFG:TSX.V; GFGSF:OTCQB,
PRG:TSX.V; PREIF:OTCBB,
TSG:TSX.V,
)

I’m at work right now. I’m still wearing my pajamas. Welcome to the strange new world of coronavirus lockdown. OK. Full disclosure – I’ve been wearing my pajamas at work for several years. That’s the beauty of working at home. Some of those It’s Your Dime Videos I did last year…I was wearing a shirt […]

It was another crazy week on Wall Street with a lot more economic doom and gloom, punctuated by a complete meltdown of the oil futures market. In this week’s Friday Gold Wrap podcast, host Mike Maharrey talks about some of the highlights – or lowlights – but he also injects a little optimism into the […]

The young born into the digital revolution know no different. Liberty will not have to be taken from them.  It has already left them.  Indeed, they never knew… by Paul Craig Roberts […]

The post Paul Craig Roberts: The Digital Revolution Is Inconsistent With Liberty appeared first on Silver Doctors.

We have debt destruction and massive money creation at the same time. What could possibly go wrong? Greg Hunter gives The Weekly News Wrap-Up for Friday, April 24th, 2020 I’ve […]

The post Greg Hunter: Both Bankruptcy And Inflation Begin, Record Unemployment, MSM Virus Treatment Lies appeared first on Silver Doctors.

SD Friday Wrap: There’s no sugar coating this one… I’m glad I started writing this a while ago because I’m fast slipping into a place I’d rather not go. It […]

The post Two Things About Coronavirus That People Just Don’t Get, And The Sad Reality That More People Have Gone Back To Sleep Than Have Woken Up appeared first on Silver Doctors.

When will we know the hyperinflationary crack-up boom has begun? When the lawsuits begin? (by Half Dollar) Usually in the installments of the Hyperinflation Watch, I write about one-off examples […]

The post Hyperinflation Watch: Amazon Sued For “Price Gouging” appeared first on Silver Doctors.