Month: June 2021

Among the many analytical reports arguing that economic fundamentals are such that the gold price should rise sharply, the annual “In Gold We Trust” reports by Incrementum AG in Liechtenstein always have provided the most supporting documentation. The one published last week is no exception.

Meanwhile virtually alone GATA long has been stuck with the less happy work of explaining why the gold price has not been heeding the fundamentals, not rising sharply, and not reflecting the grotesquely inflationary and unstable monetary conditions.

But the new “In Gold We Trust” report does include something by way of explanation. It is a long commentary by the third anonymous participant in the “Friend of Another” series of commentaries that began two decades ago at the old (and much missed) USAGold(.)com Forum.

The first two participants, “Another” and “Friend of Another,” seemed intimately familiar with central banking’s involvement with gold. There was much speculation that “Another” was indeed a European central banker himself or very close to European central bankers.

The third participant in the series, “Friend of Friend of Another,” seems to be a student of the first two and now is operating his own proprietary internet site of gold market analysis.

Ordinarily GATA avoids anonymous commentary as unreliable, but such commentary sometimes can provide valuable insights, and since Incrementum is taking responsibility for the new analysis from “FOFOA” and since this analysis is packed with historical detail, it can be heartily recommended to you. It’s posted here.

The “Another” series long acknowledged that the gold price was heavily manipulated by central banks and particularly by their underwriting of “paper” gold, the creation of vast imaginary supplies of gold for purposes of price suppression — but also that eventually gold would break out and become “Freegold” with a spectacularly higher price, eliminating any need for leverage to the price by those anticipating that price suppression could not go on forever.

Now, with seemingly imminent implementation of the “Basel 3” banking regulations recommended by the Bank for International Settlements and the desperate protest of the London Bullion Market Association and World Gold Council that “Basel 3” will destroy both “paper” gold and the LBMA itself, gold advocates are getting hopeful that Liberation Day will come this summer.

Maybe it will. Apart from simple exhaustion of the physical supply of metal available under price suppression — the cause of the collapse of the previous mechanism of price suppression, London Gold Pool, in March 1968 — it is possible to imagine price suppression being overthrown by the BIS.

That is, while the BIS continues to act as a gold broker and intervenor for all its major members, including the United States, whose intervention has aimed to protect the U.S. dollar’s status as the world reserve currency, the BIS also represents all other major central banks, and their interests may be quite opposed to indefinite and unquestioning support of the dollar and U.S. imperialism.

For example, the BIS lately may be following a course sought by an anti-U.S. and anti-United Kingdom bloc consisting of the European Union, China, and Russia, entities lately on the wrong side of U.S. and U.K. policy.

Maybe this bloc is advancing the “Basel 3” regulations to knock the U.S. and the dollar down while reliquefying themselves with a higher value for their gold reserves, as the U.S. economists Paul Brodsky and Lee Quaintance speculated was underway even nine years ago.

Unlike the International Monetary Fund, which is entirely a U.S. creation and over which the U.S. exercises veto power, the BIS has much more freedom of action. The “Another” group long has construed the BIS to be pro-gold, despite its assisting U.S.-instigated interventions against gold.

We’ll see, and maybe soon — or maybe not. Read the “FOFOA” analysis from Incrementum and see what you think.

While the GATA gang persists in what many consider to be a quixotic crusade because we think that gold price suppression is the overarching injustice in the world and thus the world’s most important issue — the undemocratic control of the valuation of all capital, labor, goods, and services for the benefit of the few — after 22 years we would enjoy not just victory over the evildoers but also the freedom to take up another line of similarly disparaged work — maybe UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, or the search for Atlantis. Even a few weeks off might be nice.

      

Source: The Critical Investor for Streetwise Reports   05/28/2021

The Critical Investor looks at Meridian Mining’s latest drill results at its Cabaçal VMS Copper-Gold Project in Brazil and explains why he likes what he sees.

With copper beating all-time highs recently, and gold briefly touching US$1900/oz, Meridian Mining UK S (MNO:TSX.V) seems to be in a good place, delivering its second set of assays from its Cabaçal VMS Copper-Gold Project in Brazil. Its ongoing 10,000-meter field program of diamond drilling recently returned assays from hole CD-005 to CD-009, and all holes contained economic mineralization. This will probably not come as a surprise for the verification holes of historical drill results, but the good news is the stepout holes into the lesser drilled areas outside the limits of mine development sometimes returned even better results. The standout hole in this case is, of course, CD-009, producing no less than 66.1m @ 1.1% copper equivalent (CuEq) from 86.9m depth.

All pictures are company material, unless stated otherwise.

All currencies are in U.S. dollars, unless stated otherwise.

As management was targeting the Southern Copper Zone (SCZ) through CD-006 and CD-009 for high grade NW-SE trending alteration pipe hosting copper-gold-silver mineralization, which usually returns relatively short, high grade results, the long intercept of 1.1% CuEq came a bit as a surprise to them. The extremely positive outcome in CD-009 was the presence of not only the broad disseminated copper-gold mineralization but also discrete higher grade gold intervals (2.7m @ 14.0g/t Au, 1.5% Cu, 7.0g/t Ag), within the aforementioned broader zone of 66.1m @ 1.1% CuEq. These sorts of grades would have normally been targeted by the historical underground development, based on the 3 g/t gold cut-off grade. The presence of such intersections indicates that high-grade gold trends remain open beyond the limits of mine development at the point of closure.

The drilling at the Eastern Copper Zone (ECZ) through CD-005, CD-007 and CD-008 targeted further near surface sulphide mineralization, and this played out perfectly, considering the results:

All intercepts are estimated to have a true width of 90% of intersection widths, which is even more impressive. On a side note, the company reported additional assays on holes CD-003 and CD-004 on May 5, 2021, adding some more high-grade mineralization, although not meaningful compared to the existing results.

The ongoing drilling campaign is designed to both infill and twin historical holes. The current batch of holes in the case of CD-006 and CD-009, the holes were drilled as part of a fan into the Southern Copper Zone, where highlights of past drilling include results of 13.4m @ 5.50% Cu, 1.31g/t Au, and 24.72g/t Ag. Holes CD005—CD007 were drilled as a series of infill holes between historical results. Holes CD005-CD007-CD008 were designed to infill on section 240-NW, where the drilling becomes more widely spaced in the shallower up-dip portion of the deposit.

The drill collar locations are indicated on the map below:

As can be seen, the most impressive holes CD-006 and CD-009 are drilled well beyond and south of the existing mine workings, which bodes well for an eventual resource expansion. These holes were drilled from the location of the historical drill pad of JUSPD 596. According to management, the last 12.8 meters of CD-009 graded over 2.0% CuEq before being terminated in a mining void, emphasizing again that the historical mining was not optimized for extraction of a copper equivalent cut-off grade. This hole will not be extended beyond the mining void for now.

I noticed drill collars labelled as high as CD024 being indicated on the map, and wondered which holes were already drilled, which are drilled now, and for which holes we could expect assays (and when the next batch). CEO Dr. Adrian McArthur commented that holes up to CD021 have been received by the laboratory with the others being processed on site for dispatch. A steady stream of results will be reported over the weeks ahead. Holes already completed are all coded in green on the map, with some of the immediately planned holes are in yellow; drilling plans are constantly being reviewed as an ongoing survey program continues to locate and validate the position of the historical drill collars.

When looking at the complete table of drill results, it appeared that the results for CD-001/004/006/009 differed quite a bit although drilled from the same location, and I asked Dr. McArthur for an explanation. Could this be faulting? He answered that these holes were drilled orthogonally into a SW plunging mineralization package, which consists of a lower stringer breccia zone and upper disseminated (and locally stringer zones). These intervals can merge and diverge (typically of alteration and mineralization pathways in with variable permeability in the original volcano-sedimentary pile). CD009 (the more northern of the holes) enters a zone where the mineralization is more contiguous.

The current presentation available on the company website contains further clarifying sections, as can be seen here:

It will be clear there is some faulting going on, combined with the stratigraphic variations mentioned by McArthur. According to him, with the holes being orthogonal, the intersections span adjacent cross-sections. Significantly on section ST-240, the trends of modelled conductors from the bore-hole geophysical program are illustrated. Section ST-245 shows again that significant copper mineralization was undeveloped with in face hole JUSPD076 on the same section crossing a mining void with mineralization above and below.

As can be seen on this map but also the first one, several historical holes are being resampled, and I wondered why these were exactly resampled, and what the historical assay results were on them if this could be disclosed already. McArthur advised that the results are shortly to be released, providing comparison with the historical intervals and the new assays. Some results have already been partly reported, with hole JUSPD050 has been resampled already, and returned 16.8m @ 2.1% Cu, 2.0g/t Au, 3.0g/t Ag & 0.2% Zn from 123.3m. The resampling achieved higher copper/gold grades to the tune of about 30% gross metal value, so this was undoubtedly a positive. When looking at another resampled hole, JUSPD076 with a much lower average grade copper and no gold, the copper grades were exactly the same, and the low-level silver couldn’t be detected, and is being reanalyzed at the moment.

As a reminder, the current drilling is part of the Cabacal Central 60–70-hole drill program for 8,000 meters, of which 30 holes are twinning holes, in order to verify the 21.7 Mt historical resource estimate. A third drill rig is operational now, which will slightly increase the turnaround time for drilling to assay results. The company also bought high-powered borehole EM equipment, which will increase the radius of detection from about 50 meters to about 150 meters. Equipment is currently under construction and is expected to be deployed in the field by mid-June. This scheduling is still up to date. According to McArthur, we can expect results at least until the end of Q3:

“As we continue to focus the first 8,000m of our inaugural 10,000m drill and trenching program on the Cabaçal mine, we still have 2,000m budgeted to confirm the already defined near-mine and regional targets of our VMS camp. We expect that additional results will continue through the summer and autumn.”

As the high recoveries were discussed in my last article as well, I wondered when Meridian Mining would be doing new metallurgic test work, in order to verify these high recoveries from historical mining operations. McArthur answered that metallurgical work will be conducted in the third quarter to supplement the already extensive data from historical operational records. Any final requirements for geotechnical and metallurgical work can be expected to be conducted as part of the final feasibility studies.

Conclusion

The second batch of Cabaçal assays solidifies even further that Meridian is advancing a reliable historical resource into an NI-43-101 compliant gem. The verification and infill holes confirm just as intended, or even better. The company has also identified a series of near mine geophysical and geochemical targets to target extensions for building markedly on the 21.7 Mt historical resource. These targets may well lead to an expansion of the drilling program in order to define the ultimate limits of the mineralization envelope. I am very much looking forward to a PEA on this project, as an NPV8 could easily top US$300 million at, for example, US$1600/oz gold and US$4/lb copper. It was a bit unfortunate to see the share price enduring some profit taking after the news came out, but I simply view this as a buying opportunity as I don’t think we will see these sub-70-cent levels much longer.

I hope you will find this article interesting and useful and will have further interest in my upcoming articles on mining. To never miss a thing, please subscribe to my free newsletter, in order to get an email notice of my new articles soon after they are published.

The Critical Investor is a newsletter and comprehensive junior mining platform, providing analysis, blog and newsfeed and all sorts of information about junior mining. The editor is an avid and critical junior mining stock investor from The Netherlands, with an MSc background in construction/project management. Number cruncher at project economics, looking for high quality companies, mostly growth/turnaround/catalyst-driven to avoid too much dependence/influence of long-term commodity pricing/market sentiments, and often looking for long-term deep value. Getting burned in the past himself at junior mining investments by following overly positive sources that more often than not avoided to mention (hidden) risks or critical flaws, The Critical Investor learned his lesson well, and goes a few steps further ever since, providing a fresh, more in-depth, and critical vision on things, hence the name.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter at: www.streetwisereports.com/get-news

Disclaimer: The author is not a registered investment advisor and has a long position in this stock. Meridian Mining is a sponsoring company. All facts are to be checked by the reader. For more information go to www.meridianmining.co and read the company’s profile and official documents on www.sedar.com, also for important risk disclosures. This article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be investment advice of any kind, and all readers are encouraged to do their own due diligence and talk to their own licensed investment advisors prior to making any investment decisions.

Streetwise Reports Disclosure:
1) The Critical Investor’s disclosures are listed above.
2) The following companies mentioned in the article are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.

4) The article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the decision to publish an article until three business days after the publication of the article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases.

Charts and graphics provided by the author.

( Companies Mentioned: MNO:TSX.V,
)